Meet the MasterMinds: Charles
Decker on Lessons from the Hive
Charles
Decker is the author of Beans: Four Principles
for Running a Business in Good Times or Bad
and Lessons
from the Hive: The Buzz on Surviving and Thriving in an
Ever-Changing Workplace. He is a Vice
President at Acumentum, Inc., an electronic publishing company,
and a contributing writer for Fast Company
magazine. He was formerly a senior executive at Amazon.com.
Lessons from the Hive is a business fable based on the
true story of a small company in the aftermath of a takeover
by a conglomerate. MCNews talked to Decker about how change
impacts an organization's people, processes, and politics,
and what executives must do to keep change programs moving
in a positive and productive direction.
MCNews: Why did you write about change as a business
fable?
Decker: I think managing change is the
biggest challenge in the workplace today, and I felt this
was a gentle way to make people realize that with change
comes opportunity, so, hopefully, they won’t fear
it as much.
The story is a universal one. And I hope the format will
generate honest, non-threatening discussion about organizational
change.
The characters are people everyone knows. They have to
balance work and family under a lot of pressure. At the
beginning of the story, the main character, Dana, is a total
train wreck. But in a period of just a week, she is able
to adapt and change. I think that inspires other people
to think it can be done.
In the book, I talk about a self-help book but don’t
reveal its title. I get at least one email every day asking
what the book is. Obviously there's a need out there for
people to figure out how they can help themselves.
MCNews: Can you reveal the book’s title to
MCNews readers?
Decker: Yes. The book is Feeling
Good by Dr. David Burns. It's about cognitive
therapy: change your thinking, change your life. The way
that people process their thoughts dictates whether they
have a good outcome or a bad outcome. I tried to show that
approach in action in Lessons from the Hive.
MCNews: The story isn’t just about personal
transformation. Isn’t it also about deception in the
workplace?
Decker: There was definitely backstabbing
going on. The company needed to grow and change but it was
all being done behind the scenes, and Dana had every right
to feel deceived. The point is that change is most successful
when an organization communicates honestly about change
in a way that generates support from the people in the organization,
rather than resistance.
MCNews: How should someone like Dana, whose company
is going through significant upheaval, handle corporate
politics, underhanded behavior, and deception?
Decker: Well, we always have to be aware
that not everybody is playing the same game on the same
playing field. The CEO character in the book does a good
job of communicating about the change that is needed, and
that’s crucial.
Managers should be honest with employees. That sounds simple,
but it never is. The tendency is to plan and implement change
in secret because you think employees will bail out or won’t
cooperate. In fact, they appreciate being told the truth,
and often come up with helpful ideas. Not only can people
handle the truth, but you can’t have trust without
it.
MCNews: What role do new employees play during times
of change?
Decker: New employees are often completely excluded from
the process, which is unfortunate. That’s why I wanted
to celebrate the Nikki character in the book. She was a
brand new employee, but she was a catalyst for transformation.
New blood can make a big difference in how a company reinvents
itself. But new people don’t get invited to the table.
That’s too bad—they offer a perspective that
more jaded employees just don’t have. The “we've
tried that, it didn't work” attitude of old timers
is a serious obstacle to change.
MCNews: Are there common behaviors you see when
people are not working effectively in the midst of change?
Decker: The biggest problem is that people
will attempt to sabotage change initiatives. And lots of
people stonewall. Both have an enormously negative effect
on morale. Much of that could be avoided with effective
communication about what's going on.
MCNews: Let's say you're a consultant working on
a change initiative and the client has a good communication
plan. What comes next to effectively implement change?
Decker: Involve employees at every single
level. We often think of senior managers as the ones that
implement change. But I think the more senior people are
often the most fearful. Go from a bottom-up approach rather
than a top-down one.
MCNews: Why is it that change in the corporate
or work environment is so difficult?
Decker: That's the $64,000 question. I
think it's because so many workers have been lied to over
the years that their own history informs them that whatever
happens, it's going to be bad.
It does come down to the way people process thoughts. Can
change be a good thing? Absolutely it can be. But people
are fearful. They think they're going to lose their jobs,
their livelihoods; they're going to have to sell their homes;
they're going to have to move; or maybe they fear failing
in whatever new environment is coming.
Leaders should help people focus on what they’ll
gain, not on what they might lose.
The other problem is that a diversified team is almost
never formed to help management with a change initiative.
Senior management—often the CEO working in collusion
with HR—takes it on. And, of course, HR departments
in most companies in this country are not trusted.
MCNews: What can HR departments do to regain credibility?
Decker: The HR industry as a whole needs
to look at itself closely and ask, “What role are
we playing? What value do we add? Sadly, they're looked
upon as a tool of management. Most employees don't trust
them, and they don't go to them for career advice. And the
problems employees do take to HR are seldom solved.
People do need help managing their careers. But the attitude
seems to be, “this is your job, do it and when you're
sick of it, find something else to do.” That's not
good enough.
HR departments are largely transaction based—they
do payroll and benefits. Anything that involves helping
people is an adjunct or a small part of what they do.
MCNews: Could HR become a more strategic player
in the workplace?
Decker: I think it really could. HR departments
that manage companies' emails and Intranets, for example,
have a great opportunity to take a more active role. Intranets
can play an important part in making opportunities happen
for employees. But instead, you just go there for help running
your computer or to get a form.
There's so much more they could do. Too many companies
treat HR as just overhead and it becomes kind of a backwater.
That's a tragic waste of resources.
MCNews: Did you intend the story to be prescriptive?
Decker: It’s not. I think trying
to create something that's going to work for all doesn't
work for anybody. There is no set prescription—do
this, follow this plan, and you will have this outcome.
Every company has its own history and its own issues. Take
the story for what it's worth and create your own outcome.
Recognize that everyone in an organization is coming from
a different place. They're going to accept or reject change
based on their history. There isn’t just one way to
manage through change.
Diversity of style at work is something people don't talk
about very much. I think that deserves more attention. Everybody
has a unique way of working, and we have to adapt change
initiatives to those styles.
I don't think it’s asking too much for change to
be customized. People would like it to be neat and tidy
so they can put it all in one e-mail that goes to the entire
company. That's just being lazy.
MCNews: Thanks for your time.
You can email Charles Decker at cdecker@acumentum.info.
|