Meet the MasterMinds: David Allen Helps You Get Things
Done
David
Allen is the author of the best selling, Getting
Things Done: the Art of Stress-Free Productivity,
and founder of the David Allen Company, a consulting, coaching
and training company. He is also a frequent speaker on the
topics of time and stress management, individual and team
productivity and high performance work practices.
In the past twenty years, Allen has helped
improve productivity for more than half a million professionals
in hundreds of organizations worldwide, including Fortune
500 companies and governmental agencies.
* * * * *
MCNews: Getting more done, with less stress,
is probably at the top of many New Year's resolution lists.
What's different about your approach?
Allen: A lot of people, even with great
intentions, are less than successful when they try to get
themselves organized. The main reason for the high failure
rate is that most people have not had a model for productivity
they could trust. The approach I've written about tells
you what to do with everything. You see how it actually
works and that makes it a lot easier to see the payoff.
You realize there will be a valuable outcome at the end
of the process, rather than it being just another blind
path.
MCNews: People do seem really stressed
these days with too much to do and not enough time to do
it. Has our world gotten that much more complicated, or
is something else going on here?
Allen: There is something else going
on: the frequency of having your world disrupted. You
will change careers more times than your parents changed
jobs. When your parents were thrown into new situations,
they had an overwhelming sense of ambiguity and stress until
they adapted. Then, they got to cruise for another twelve
point six years.
You, on the other hand, have about two weeks
to adapt to changes, and then you've got to do it again.
The issues are the same, but the constant upheaval and need
to recalibrate are new. The stress of change is ongoing
right now. Some of that is due to more technology and globalization.
One thing is certain: we are constantly in crisis mode.
But in a strange way, people relax more in
crisis because it gets them focused and relieves the pressure
of future crises. If you blow a tire on the freeway, you
roll up your sleeves and focus on that crisis. You aren't
thinking about that staff problem you haven't figured out,
or the kids at camp, or whether you need a new investment
advisor.
The real stress comes when you take away the
immediate crisis and the next level of stress that's been
sublimated bubbles to the surface. It's the sublimated stress
that burns people out.
MCNews: What do you mean by sublimated
stress?
Allen: Think about what happens when
you need to complete some task. If you can't finish it right
when you think of it and you don't park it in some trusted
place outside your head, it creates an infinite amount of
stress for you.
The reason is that the place in our heads
where we file stuff has no sense of past or future.
So, as soon as you file two things in your head without
an objective system to track them, some part of you thinks
you should be doing both of them at the same time. That
builds subliminal stress, which is what drains our energy.
MCNews: So, the first step to stress-free
productivity is to get the "stuff" out of our
heads?
Allen: Yes. Of the five stages for
managing the flow of work, the first and primary is to make
sure you've got all of your potential commitments in a place
where they are easily retrievable. Your head is a major
source of leaks because an item is virtually lost as soon
as you file it in there, just as it's lost if you put it
on a post-it that gets stuck somewhere you won't look.
All your commitments must be captured and
tracked in some way. At the very least, you need to
throw them into temporary buckets, like your paper in-basket.
But, of course, the buckets--whether it's voicemail, email,
recording devices or your in-basket--have to be emptied,
processed and organized, sooner rather than later. Otherwise,
the stuff crawls right back up into your head.
MCNews: What's the next step once you have
emptied the commitments from your head and elsewhere?
Allen: Well, once you have collected
it all, either on a list, on scraps of paper or have recorded
everything somewhere, you need to go through each item
one at a time and make the processing decisions about it.
Is it actionable, yes or no? If it's actionable, you decide
what the next action should be. Then, you decide if you
should do it, delegate it or defer it. That is the thinking
that needs to be done about every potential item of work
that we generate ourselves or that we collect from other
people.
You know intuitively that there is something
important about distributing your cognition and getting
stuff out of your head so you can be more objective. But
most people only note enough to remind them about the work
at hand; they don't finish defining what that work is.
Quite simply, the way you get things done
is you define what done means, and you define what doing
looks like. Because, guess what? Most people have not
made those two decisions about most everything that demands
their attention.
You have to sit down and ask, okay what am
I trying to do about this staff situation or about this
client presentation? You've got to define what you are trying
to accomplish, and then you have to decide what, exactly,
is the very next physical thing that needs to happen. Until
you decide what to do next, your brain will keep bothering
you about it.
You must decide what doing looks like, whether
that next step is yours to take or somebody else's. Until
you actually get it down to that level, your brain keeps
running this loop: got to decide, got to decide, hey, I
got to decide, bother, bother. Most people have just lived
in that mode constantly since they have been conscious,
so they don't even know there is another way. The key is
making the operational decisions about what doing would
look on each item.
The whole point of making decisions and defining
your work as best as you can is that the work keeps coming
at you. You need to look at the predefined work against
the ad hoc stuff to make a professional triage call and
not get snared in the busy trap, just dealing with the latest
and loudest because you can't think about the rest.
MCNews: Many people use to-do lists, and
would probably say they work okay. What do you think about
the effectiveness of the traditional to-do list?
Allen: It depends on what you mean
by a to-do list. My lists are ultimately to-do lists because
they define what doing is. But, what most people call a
to-do list is incomplete and unclear, which is highly unattractive.
Everything on your list is either attracting or repelling
you psychologically. There is no neutral response: it's
either, oh boy, when can I mark that off or, get out of
my face. If there are still a lot of decisions you need
to make about items on your list, your brain glances at
the list and says, I don't have the energy to do all that
thinking, go away.
You don't usually see specific actions on
to-do lists because most people haven't forced themselves
to sit down and finish their thinking about what has their
attention. They collect items in their in-basket or think
they have made a list, but there is another level of thinking
that is required to move forward.
Another problem with to-do lists is that people
try to do all five phases of the workflow process at once.
They get their back up against the wall and feel stressed.
So they try to collect everything they need to do, process,
organize, review and make priority decisions about the whole
thing all at once. You can blow a fuse trying to do that.
It does relieve pressure temporarily to know
you need to do "something" about an item, but
that approach does not get your energy positively engaged
to be productive. So, back to your question on to-do lists:
no, they don't usually work the way most people use them.
Daily to-do lists haven't worked since the telephone
was invented.
MCNews: There is no shortage of tools and
techniques, like planners and PDA's to help people get a
handle on the stress in their lives. Do you think such tools
work?
Allen: They don't work any better than
a knife works. It's all in how you use it, right? Tools
are static. They don't get you organized, make decisions
for you, or teach you how to think. They can facilitate
thinking a little bit because your mind, to some degree,
works in a function-follows-form fashion. In other words,
give yourself a blank page and your brain wants to fill
it up because it can't stand a vacuum. So, as long as you
create the right forms, tools can facilitate thinking.
The point is that tools are critical, but
before a tool can really work for you, there needs to be
an understanding of how we think. What's different about
my approach is that it is based on our thinking algorithm,
not just a set of organizing tools.
MCNews: How much time does it take to do
the kind of thinking you are talking about?
Allen: The executive thinking needed
to process input from your in-basket, email, notes, etc.,
takes from thirty minutes to one and a half hours a day
for the typical professional. You could be working off your
list, dealing with the phone calls you didn't expect or
processing your email. Those are three very different activities,
and you can't do them at the same time. People get upset
when they are not getting their to-do lists done, but the
truth is that most people are relatively unconscious about
all of the things that are coming at them and how sophisticated
their lives are.
Most people just haven't trained themselves
to sit down and do the kind of thinking on the front end
that would allow them to manage their commitments in a complete
way. It doesn't get rid of your problems, but it does
elevate them to a level where they can be managed.
MCNews: When you start to work with someone,
what is the most common improvement you see right away?
Allen: Getting it all out of the head and into a
trusted bucket, and then making the operational, executive
decisions. Most people are doing that to some degree, but
there is a light-year difference between getting it all
and getting a lot. It can feel worse to get a lot, because
you don't know where the end is--you can't see the light
at the end of the tunnel.
Then, whatever system you are using is not
giving you the payoff, which is to relieve the brain from
the lower level tasks of remembering and reminding. The
certificate or degree you get from doing it completely is
that your brain graduates to a higher level where you get
to make intuitive choices from your options. Used properly,
an external system manages lower level tasking much better
than your brain can anyway.
Until you empty your brain completely and
organize and process everything that was in there, it's
almost not worth doing at all. Maybe I'm getting old and
cranky, but I think if you are not willing to get it all
down, don't do any of it. Otherwise, you are just giving
yourself something else to do that you aren't going to feel
good about.
MCNews: What challenges are there in implementing
your approach?
Allen: The good and bad news about
my approach is that it's a transformational way to think
about your life, and once you do the hard work, suddenly
you start to see the fog lift. But, implementing my method
is far outside most people's comfort zone. They start the
process, feel fabulous and then they back off because they
can only handle so much fabulous feeling.
People's addiction to stress is the biggest barrier to
truly getting organized. You start to feel good and
excited, but you can handle only so much of that before
some part of you unconsciously slacks off and lets the world
fall apart again to get you back to the level of stress
to which you are addicted.
And, here's the pain: this is not light-weight
information; once you do get organized, there are a whole
lot of people who are going to start upsetting you who never
upset you before. Once you raise your standards, you start
noticing behavior you never noticed before: people not asking
what the next action is, or nodding and saying they got
it without writing anything down. And, you're thinking,
well that went into a black hole.
MCNews: Are you working on another book?
Allen: Two books, actually. The first
should be out by the end of 2003. The book is based on the
underlying principles and dynamics that lie behind the best
practices of personal productivity--everything that we could
all do more of, and be more aware of (other than work harder!)
that makes things function better in life and work. The
next book is related to a seminar I do called "Leveraging
Focus in Vision," and is about the magic that happens
when you start to image things and how that affects perception
and performance.
MCNews: We will be watching for them. Thanks
for being so generous with your time.
Find out more about David Allen, his services
and his e-newsletter at www.davidco.com.
|