"Beauty is Only Skin Deep:" Does Your Firm Truly
Embrace Differentiation?
by Suzanne Lowe
Most professional service firms pursue some
sort of differentiation. According to one of Expertise Marketing's
recent studies, 81% of professional service firms reported
they used differentiation as a marketing approach in the
previous three years; unfortunately, a majority thought
of differentiation as simply an exercise in image enhancement.
But, like the adage "beauty is only skin
deep," image-oriented differentiation strategies only
go so far in their ability to deliver an effective marketplace
advantage.
The reality is that when it comes to differentiation,
the more complex and operationally deep the differentiation
strategy is, the more competitively potent it is. The "easier"
and more operationally shallow methods reap the least rewards.
In recent surveys, it appears that the most-used
differentiators were not necessarily the most successful,
(for example, developing a new positioning, repackaging
current services, or using new techniques and tools to "deliver"
services). The more operationally "deep" the differentiation
strategies were (for example, those requiring the implementation
and alignment of human resources, financial, change management,
technology or training and development processes), the more
successful they were.
Examples of competitively advantaged differentiation
methods include adding new-to-the-firm services that blend
into the services of another industry, or implementing a
formal relationship management program to strengthen a firm's
bonds with its current clients.
Ultimately, the most competitively robust
differentiation strategies are grounded in a firm's professionally
driven and culturally supported processes, protocols and
methods; many of these are already unique to each firm.
But beyond that, professional service firms are building
differentiation strategies upon a number of foundations
besides the already mentioned "image" foundation:
These include:
- a firm's geographical focus
- service offerings
- client needs addressed
- a project's "point of entry"
- staff
- service delivery
- value delivered (this goes much deeper than "price")
- targets
- position-if it's first, or
- the consistent delivery of a unique emotional "experience"
to clients.
Malcolm Pirnie. Inc., an environmental engineering,
science and consulting firm, incrementally differentiated
itself by making a series of choices to distinguish its
service offerings from its competitors. The firm's results
as of the writing of Marketplace Masters were
impressive:
- Pirnie became one of the most honored firms in the
environmental profession, recognized for engineering
excellence in competitions nationwide; many of these
projects reflect the firm's differentiation strategies.
- Always profitable, the firm doubled in size since
its initial forays into differentiation.
- Its employee retention has been higher than industry
norms.
Guidelines for Developing a Competitively
Potent Differentiation Strategy
How does one truly approach competitive differentiation,
and imbed these concepts into the firm? Following are guidelines
and a methodology for developing a differentiation strategy
that works best for your firm and that also is competitively
preemptive in the marketplace.
Past track record on differentiation:
Has your firm ever undertaken any kind of differentiation
initiative? What was the outcome? All too often it's a blandly
broad statement, residing in a pretty report or perhaps
on a firm's web site that expresses how your firm is different.
Knowledge about differentiation: How
well do your firm's leaders "get it" about differentiation?
That it means your firm is the only firm to be, to do or
to have something that can't be copied; something that no
other firm is, does or has?
Many professionals (and marketers too) have
varying definitions of the terms "differentiation,"
"positioning," and "branding." Often,
they treat these strategies as if they are the same (they
are not!), or at least interchangeable (again, not at all!).
What does each platform mean separately, and in relation
to the other?
Leadership: How keenly do your firm's
leaders perceive the crucial role of differentiation in
a professional service firm's corporate strategy? Is it
viewed as a critical firm-wide strategy that is supposed
to be implemented, as it should be? Or instead is it viewed
as a marketing communication initiative--evidence of a lightweight
approach to differentiation? (It's lightweight if you see
that your firm has not set up any processes or tools to
operationally support its differentiation strategies.)
Do your firm's leaders understand how to assess
the criteria for determining the most robust possible differentiation
platform for your firm (value for clients, credibility,
attractiveness, sustainability, narrow focus, and protection
against copy-cats)?
Attitude about differentiation: Do many of your firm's
professionals scoff at the notion of real differentiation,
that it cannot be achieved? If so, this is a signal that
they may not understand the elements or foundation of differentiation
strategies. Are your firm's leaders convinced that the firm
is different, when in fact this is nowhere near the case
(and everyone else knows it!)?
Differentiation champions and influencers:
Does your firm have a professional-side partner or director
whose voice on marketing has earned his or her colleagues'
respect? This would be a person who is not viewed as so
avant-garde that s/he is held on the firm's metaphorical
"sideline." ("There goes Jean-Philippe again--he
has such a strong voice that people have just begun to tune
him out.")
This could also be someone who has demonstrated
successful leadership on previous firm initiatives. If so,
how tired or skeptical is the organization of seeing this
person step up to the plate to push the firm toward a new
initiative? ("Nadia really pulled out all the stops
last year to get us to do the XXX project; I think people
are tired of hearing from her!") Does your firm have
a staff-side chief marketing officer or marketing director?
If so, is this person mainly responsible for marketing communications
activities (anything related to building visibility and
not the development of marketing strategy)? What is the
level of "power" of this person in your firm?
Knowledge, leadership and attitudes about
differentiation will indicate how ready and willing your
firm is to undertake the process. With a differentiation
champion, you can make inroads into the firm's differentiation
process and truly create a compelling competitive position
in the marketplace.
Suzanne Lowe is president of Expertise Marketing,
LLC, a consulting firm that provides marketing and management
analysis and guidance for leaders of professional service
firms. She is also the author of Marketplace
Masters: How Professional Service Firms Compete to Win
and publisher of the monthly newsletter The Marketplace
Master. For more information, see www.marketplacemasters.com
and www.expertisemarketing.com.
|